Search for: "Johnson v. Case" Results 1681 - 1700 of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
We conclude that, although the trial court has the discretion to resentence the defendant, Jennifer Johnson, it was improper under the circumstances of the present case to order it to hold a resentencing hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
Santos (No. 06-1005) money laundering case and this report on the Court's decision not to hear University of Phoenix v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
Martin, but the Ninth just danced around Martin, and now the issue is back before the Supreme Court in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
Rhetorical Question: When will Texas be done with fixed/floating royalty cases such as Johnson et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
" A claim of false advertising may be based on at at least one of two theories (Time Warner Cable v DIRECTV (2007)):that the challenged ad is literally falsethat the ad, while not literally false, is nevertheless likely to mislead or confuse consumersThe claimant must demonstrate that the false or misleading representation involved an inherent or material quality of the product and that the injuries to be redressed are the result of "public deception" (Johnson &… [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:26 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
This defense is commonly referred to as the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense, based on the Supreme Court cases Faragher v. [read post]
   According to evidence provided in the case of Nzolameso v City of Westminster, in October 2013 48% of the temporary accommodation provided Westminster was outside the borough. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
The Court also issued its decision today in three cases consolidated under the caption Birchfield v. [read post]