Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 1681 - 1700 of 6,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2009, 4:30 am
" The panel rejected the district court's conclusion that the class certification stage was not the proper time for the defendants to rebut the lead plaintiffs' fraud on the market presumption.In effect, the 5th Circuit in Oscar reversed the burden of proof involved with the fraud on the market presumption. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm by Doorey
  The class of plaintiffs would eventually include family members of people killed in the Rana Plaza collapse, and people who suffered injuries in the collapse but who survived. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:26 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  A leading health care company has succeeded in obtaining a court order decertifying a collective action brought by software consultants under the Fair Labor Standards Act and defeating the consultants’ bid for class action certification under stat [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:30 pm by HL Chronicle of Data Protection
Robins, a case that examined the question of whether a plaintiff who sued for a technical violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) could maintain Article III standing for a class action without claiming any real-world injury. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:45 am by Natalie Newman
 Additionally, the lead plaintiff in this case, Jane Doe, claims that Netflix’s disclosure of her movie rental history and ratings has and/or will “identify or permit inference of her sexual orientation… [which… ] would negatively affect her ability to pursue her livelihood and support her family, and would hinder her and her children’ ability to live peaceful lives within Plaintiff Doe’s community. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Plaintiffs’ experts will allege that the price premium is applied to all class period unit sales of a product to obtain a damages figure. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:00 am by Greg Mersol
It therefore decertified the collective action and dismissed all but the lead plaintiff’s claims without prejudice. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm by msW1Ld
Wild, Max Wild and John Perrin of the Wild Law Group PLLC serve as interim lead and liaison counsel for the Indirect Purchaser Class in In re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1952. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:41 pm
The commonality among the cases enables lawyers to pursue a campaign against the defendant, leading to an effective outcome for each individual plaintiff. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:37 am by Greg Mersol
The second Cruz opinion continues to underscore that courts, particularly those with heavy class action dockets, are becoming increasingly skeptical of settlements that favor the lead plaintiffs and their attorneys. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:24 am by Altman & Altman
The other plaintiffs, which filed in 2014, were awarded $55 million and $72 million. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:24 am by Altman & Altman
The other plaintiffs, which filed in 2014, were awarded $55 million and $72 million. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
The MLG arrangement discourages maximum commitment on behalf of the class because even if class counsel should win at trial, they will not be entitled to any compensation, whether from the recovery (no such agreement is in place) or via the plaintiff’s claim for costs (no costs can be awarded because the representative plaintiff has no liability to pay legal expenses.[1]) The MLG arrangement encourages only a minimal commitment on behalf of the… [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:25 am by Andrew Trask
 Judges have a compelling (and admirable) interest in clearing their dockets that lead them to favor settlements of class actions where possible. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed in a series of post on this blog (most recently here), over the last year plaintiffs’ lawyers have filed nearly 30 COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuits. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
On January 31, 2011, the District Court for Southern District of Ohio granted defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion, dismissing indirect purchaser class actions that challenged proposed reverse payment agreements as anticompetitive under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]