Search for: "London v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am by Bill Ward
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
Co., 290 AD2d 278 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 605 [2002]; McGinley v Odyssey Re (London), 15 AD3d 218 [2005]). [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Shoesmith, R (on the application of) v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642 (27 May 2011) – Read judgment In April 2005, Sharon Shoesmith was appointed as Director of Children’s Services at Haringey London Borough Council. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
London mayoral candidate Laurence Fox is being sued for libel after he called three people “paedophiles” on Twitter. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:21 pm by Lawrence Solum
The evacuations occurred in three waves - the first (and largest) occurring before bombing began, between September 1-3, 1939; the second after the beginning of the “blitz” in 1940; and the last when the V-1 and V-2 rockets attacked London and the southeast of England in 1944. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Ruspoli knew or believed that the Statue was owned by .the Kingdom of Cambodia or knowingly provided false or misleading provenance information about the Statue;Legal observers of the case, docketed as United States Of America v. [read post]
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
The First Circuit heard oral argument on Wednesday in the matter of Boston Gas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Jeremy reports on the joint BLACA-IPKat event on sensory copyright [on which see earlier Katpost here].* "FAGE, Feta, Fontina": GIs come under scrutinyBusy week of IP events for Jeremy, who this time recounts another tasty seminar entitled "Geographical Indications: FAGE, Feta, Fontina, and the battle for world markets".* A  test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part III Here Jeremy hosts the third in the series of posts from London-based law firm Bristows (where… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
This generally hostile reception contrasts with the way many state supreme courts in the 1950s and 60s quickly adopted Berman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The EBA’s decision states that the two approaches give the same result and referred to various national cases. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:02 am
Supreme Court's 2008 judgment in Baze v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In this case, the legislation has changed over time. ii) Any steps before 1 October 2010 fell to be considered under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as per Lewisham v London Borough of Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, and thereafter under Equality Act 2010. iii) Causation – the Court held that Ms V was prevented from working by her disability and it was this that led to the arrears. iv) Commencing possession proceedings – under Malcolm v… [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
; FALQs: Brexit Referendum; and The UK’s Legal Response to the London Bombings of 7/7. [read post]