Search for: "MARK CLARK"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 1:57 pm
” Clark asks. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Tory pack rounds on Ken Clarke You don’t always have to agree with people to recognise their value. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:54 am
" (page 5)Promethean Inc. v. eInstruction Corporation, 9-10-cv-00106 (TXED November 30, 2010, Order) (Clark, J.) [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:22 am
In Clark Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
At an event marking the first anniversary of the “Libel Reform Campaign”, Justice minister Lord McNally said that English libel law is “not fit for purpose”. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:05 pm
Kathy Hessler Daniel Simberloff Using Environmental Laws to Crack Down on Animal Agriculture Kathy Hessler Bruce Myers Animal Advocacy Approaches: Movements Moving Forward Lee Hall Paul Shapiro No Dog Left Behind: Hospice Patients & Their Companion Animals Mark Cushing Dianne McGill Student Career Summit: Using the Jobs We Have, Getting the Jobs We Need Libby Davis Kathy Hessler Matthew Liebman Nicole Pallotta Nancy Perry Animal Law Academics Workshop: Using the Classes We Have, Getting… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:46 pm
2010 Animal Law Conference: Animals in Crisis No Dog Left Behind – Hospice Patients & Their Companion Animals October 17, 2010 Animal Law Conference web page | Speaker Biographies | Animal Law Conference Program | email the Center for Animal Law Studies | Agenda Page No Dog Left Behind – Hospice Patients & Their Companion Animals Mark Cushing – Chair, Government Relations and Public Policy Practice Group, Tonkon Torp LLP Dianne McGill –… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:16 am
Douglas appeared at the ceremony marking the opening of the new law library. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
There has already been significant commentary in the press, for example in the Guardian: Ken Clarke’s focus on mental health is bold and progressive by Mark Davies, and ‘Prison works’ – but this is no way to cut crime by Alan Travis. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:19 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
McCauliff, Religion and the Secular State [Abstract], 58 American Journal of Comparative Law 31-49 (2010).Mark Strasser, Passive Observers, Passive Displays, and the Establishment Clause,14 Lewis and Clark Law Review 1123-1157 (2010).Jennifer Wacek, The Multivocal Shari'a in History and Literature, 28 Wisconsin International Law Journal 299-324 (2010).Recent Book:Timothy Lubin, Donald R. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
” Lord Clarke supported Lord Phillips wholeheartedly. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Perhaps the last word should do to Aidan Clarke (Marks & Clerk), who is quoted in a media release as saying: "“... not every company with the word ‘face’ as part of its brand should necessarily be worried. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
You will receive the same mark and you will never know if you have reached the right answer. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:50 am
I'm aware of one case that's previously had a scheduling conference in Judge Ron Clark's court, but the cases set for status conferences in Tyler to date have settled prior to the hearings, and these are the first in Marshall. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am
123, or 62%, of the 2010 AmLaw 200 law firms are now blogging. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
In view of the limited nature of the permitted disclosure and the other matters properly considered by the judge, it cannot be said that, in relation to this issue, he “erred in principle or reached a conclusion which was plainly wrong”, that being the test to be applied on appeal: Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103, [2007] EWCA Civ 295, at paragraph 45 (per Sir Anthony Clarke MR). [read post]
