Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:48 pm by JP Sarmiento
While we prepared his case, the AAO set the new standards for NIW cases in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:39 pm
 See Matter of C—H—, 9 I&N Dec. 265, 266 (Regional Commissioner 1961).Our client was married to a US citizen. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" When asked during his deposition if he considered his conduct "to be molestation," appellant responded "[n]o," stating there was "no sexual intent. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Andy
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:41 am by Jon Sands
Slade, No. 16-30150 (10-10-17)(Bea w/McKeown & N. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to hear any suggestions people might have; I still have a few weeks to edit it before it's put to bed. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Insurance in Québec: “Care, Custody & Control” Exclusions Compagnie canadienne d’assurances générales Lombard v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:40 am by Administrator
D/B/A Roscoe’s House of Chicken N’ Waffles Beasely is a great case example of same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:40 am by Robertson Branigan
D/B/A Roscoe’s House of Chicken N’ Waffles Beasely is a great case example of same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Sam Brunson
[fn4] It’s worth noting, though, that section 119(d) has significant limitations absent from section 107(2). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The first episode addresses biotech inventions in general, controversies, case law, hot topics, and biotech R&D financing, also providing some interesting figures of the matter. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:36 pm by Gregory Forman
It further noted that Rule 4(d)(5), SCADR, states that “[i]n lieu of mediation, the parties may elect to submit issues of property and alimony to binding arbitration in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act…” and that this subsection did not grant a similar right to arbitrate custody and visitation issues. [read post]