Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:52 pm
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:25 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:59 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:35 pm
Taking evidence or statements from persons;b. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
http://bit.ly/RN4gfL (@OrangeLT) Case In Point: 30(B)(6) Witnesses? [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
[B.] [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm
Matter of Julian B. v Williams, 97 AD3d 670). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
Eisenberg & Arti K. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Super. 2011), affirmed by an equally divided court, 106 A.3d 705 (Pa. 2014), which dealt with the admissibility and authentication of cell phone text messages.It can be expected that a similar ruling will also be handed down in the context of a civil litigation matter should that issue come before the trial or appellate courts.In terms of social media discovery decisions, in Kelter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
BRETT ALLEN PARNELL, Appellee. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Injunction for protection against domestic violence -- Jurisdiction -- Domiciliary of state -- Trial court did not err in determining that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over wife's dissolution of marriage petition because wife, who was in United States on non-immigrant tourist visa, had not established actual residency with an intent to remain permanently in state -- Contrary to wife's assertion, trial… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:29 am
More often, it’s the facts that matter more than the law. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
These 44(k) obligations require documentation but not any Impact Ratio Analysis, Bulger noted. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:40 pm
B. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
"Luis Villa's Blog"Specifically, the Supreme Court found that when you have invention A, and invention B, and combine them to make invention C, the court should be very careful to ensure that the combination of A and B isn't obvious. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:49 am
For parties seeking a divorce or otherwise involved in a family law matter, the rule revisions are very important. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
Here, the error was plain and the matter was remanded for discovery and possibly a plenary hearing. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 11:35 am
The lesson of the CAA and Notice 2021-25 is that, no matter how well-intentioned Congress and the IRS may be, tax law is invariably riddled with uncertainty. [read post]
