Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 4,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) “Yes,” says Judge Maurice Paul in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:03 pm
Furthermore, he has apparently franchised the NAKED COWBOY name to exhibitionists in other cities across the United States for about $5,000 per year (money well spent, I’m sure). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:56 pm
(Copyrights & Campaigns) Gizmodo – Gizmodo caught in copyright crossfire (TorrentFreak) Twitter – Twitter removes update posted by music writer who runs JP’s Blog citing DMCA takedown request from unnamed sender (Ars Technica) Universal Music Group – UMG files 9th Circuit brief in Veoh case (Copyrights & Campaigns) YouTube – Podcast on Viacom v YouTube case (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Trade Marks & Domain Names –… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:31 pm
Highlights this week included: Music industry fails in High Court bid to force 3 strikes on ISP: EMI Records (Ireland) Limited v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:04 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23: Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 08/15/14 http://t…. http://t.co/Hhq8jcURrI -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23 http://t.co/ZoOucpLlCP -> Statements on Web can be misrepresentations Hazjizadeh v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 CanLII 48552 http://t.co/Rmc0Czbvra -> TripQuest found confusing with MapQuest, MapQuest v The Lodging Company Reservations 2014 TMOB 113 … [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23: Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 08/15/14 http://t…. http://t.co/Hhq8jcURrI -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-08-23 http://t.co/ZoOucpLlCP -> Statements on Web can be misrepresentations Hazjizadeh v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 CanLII 48552 http://t.co/Rmc0Czbvra -> TripQuest found confusing with MapQuest, MapQuest v The Lodging Company Reservations 2014 TMOB 113 … [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Le Hara v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
However, recordings released before 1972 are protected by state-level rather than federal copyright law, so digital services argued that that royalty obligation didn't apply to pre-1972 tracks. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
In fact, the committee has received copious data on the state of educational copying. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:17 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as follows. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:42 pm
Further, the test as to whether confusion has occurred is set down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as per Case C-2511/95 Sabel BV v Puma AG [1998] European Trade Marks Report 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
”), opened her eyes, made noises, moved her arms in a way indicating her mood and needs, and responded to music. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:10 pm
(Fyock v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
— United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
