Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 4:26 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
Martin is now the second District of Arizona case to reject Ramirez and adopt the majority reasoning that preemption applies to off-label uses (the other is Scovil v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The Court of Appeals' 5-1 decision in Walton v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:22 am
”The full text of the ruling is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_01528.htm* Judge Smith dissents in an opinion. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: A jury convicted Morris of felony property destruction. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:31 am
Summary of Decision issued October 6, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Sandoval v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:41 am
Justice Smith provided the following reasons: [17] There is no question that the plaintiff suffered major trauma in the accident. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:29 am
See Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
While the tenor of the arguments in both cases suggest that the dividing line is the degree of judicial deference to legislative will, the voting pattern suggests otherwise: Judges Read and Graffeo were in the minority in Tzolis and the majority in Appleton; Judges Smith and Pigott were in the majority in both; and Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Ciparick were in the… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm
In discussing Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
Reed Smith’s ACA Reporting Reed Smith has been closely covering ACA developments, including enactment of the legislation and ongoing Administration implementation efforts. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Those five Justices formed a majority to hold that the mentally retarded cannot be executed. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
Christie v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Most observers understandably have focused on two major aspects of the ruling:(i) The Court held that customers have at least some "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the cell-site location information (CSLI) records that their service providers maintain about them--a new "exception" to the so-called "third-party doctrine," and thus a repudiation of the principle the Court announced in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
The Smith case (1979): In the Smith case (Smith v. [read post]
