Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney
21 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:38 am
" United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a forum-selection case, and United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Here in SHAHRAM DAVID LAVIAN, -v.- IRA DANIEL TOKAYER, ESQ., 08 Civ. 938 (PAC) (GWG); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
A United States Federal District Court in Texas recently discussed the above in a case. [read post]
19 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
Groumoutis believed that "use" meant "made," he could not have believed that the marks were used in the United States because Opposer's clothing items were not made in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
The Court set out the three factor test noted in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am
The consideration for the contract is Petitioner’s agreement not to use or register the NAKED trademark for condoms in the United States and Respondent’s agreement not to use or register the NUDE trademark for condoms. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
This week marks the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
United States, an immigration case, Chief Justice John Roberts “took issue … with the Trump administration’s stance,” “saying it could make it too easy for the government to strip people of citizenship for lying about minor infractions. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
Fund v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
