Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 22,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Loughlin’s rejection of constitutionalism as a general matter is less compelling than his critique of the juristocracy wrought by American constitutionalism in particular. [read post]
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
29 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
In a footnote: “We are not adopting our entire antitrust corpus as the relevant standard to use in defining the market. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
Taking lead-time and costs into account, the proposed rules would adopt different emission rate limits and deadlines for various subcategories of coal- and gas-fired generating units considering, among other things, how long they will operate and how much they will be used. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The analytical mismatch between Circular A-4 and fiscal rules makes the 2023 MOA a wiser path. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Pursuant to the 2008 Memorandum of Understanding with the Attorney General, for matters assigned to the judiciary, court staff (provincial employees) act pursuant to the direction of the Chief Justice. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
In this context, the Board, following the line adopted in T 971/11 of 4 March 2016, considers that a document which would have been admitted into appeal proceedings if it had been filed for the first time at the outset of those proceedings should not be held inadmissible for the sole reason that it was already filed before the department of first instance (and not admitted) (see point 1.3 of the Reasons).1.2 In this respect, at the oral proceedings before the opposition division, after the… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 pm
" As noted by a recent article, several of our sister states have adopted the UPA approach providing that a child born from a pregnancy commenced through IVF after divorce is not the child of the non-consenting former spouse unless that individual agrees to further involvement. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm
Most states will, as a matter of comity, let people who formed a corporation under some other jurisdiction's law exercise corporate privileges here too. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
If we think – and I suspect many don’t – that the difference matters, then to have them all swept up together under the banner of regulation is unhelpful. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:54 pm
But Rule 28 is still on the books. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
One of those topics is rule 14a-8[1] and shareholder proposals, a subject on which many SEC commissioners have provided their views over the years and, indeed, decades.[2] Today, I will add my thoughts on rule 14a-8 to this already robust collection.[3] I have been involved with this rule to some degree during the near-entirety of my 17-plus years with the Commission. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
Toward that end, it adopted another ordinance establishing a zoning overlay district designating such areas; that ordinance, which the City adopted after considerable study and analysis described in detail in the opinion, was the CEQA “Project” at issue in the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
May 18, 2023) Granting reconsideration, the court reverses its previous ruling and dismisses the claims with prejudice. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
Madison adopting a federal counterpart.So how does this affect the next Presidential election? [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
The precise standards of these two requirements have developed over time, with almost each international criminal jurisdiction adopting slightly different rules. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:50 pm
Personal Injury Laws & Rules: Nation vs. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
It's not a matter of special favoritism for Indians, as such. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:43 am
Matter of Bennett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Why a Ban Just Won’t Cut It If protecting user data is indeed a critical matter of national security, then lawmakers should treat it as such. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
But if an exercise of coercive power matters so much to the Article III standing inquiry, how to explain decisions like Massachusetts v. [read post]
