Search for: "Paine v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Smith, Jr. stated for the majority, We find this to be repugnant to the Constitution, and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Against that backdrop, next week the Court will hear oral arguments in Sheriff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Kresich v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Kresich v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1036,… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
In other words, counsel in both states appear to have been of the same mind. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
See Narvaez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:23 am
In early 2009, Marion Superior Justice David Dreyer drafted an opinion in John Doe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 2:54 am
Yesterday, an appeals court reversed the trial judge's finding and issued its decision in Wilson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:30 am
In Marsteller v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
In a recent case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:58 am
The Case In Seminole Lakes Homeowner’s Association (HOA) v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
In a brief memorandum opinion, the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) today affirmed the Appellate Division's decision in Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
JP v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
O'HARA v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
" The Second Circuit says the state regulation is legal and does not deny the students their rights under federal law.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:13 am
Then look at Hyde v. [read post]
