Search for: "People v Court"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 61,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 6:18 pm
In the recent case of People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
In Viacom v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The California Supreme Court should grant review in this one.Not because it's a critical issue. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 10:44 am
Sure, the Court of Appeal may not have actually said anything of substance yet. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:47 pm
Gotta love those four-day weekends.A couple of published cases from the California Court of Appeal, including this one. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
The Court’s March 1937 decision in West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
Well, I have a new development for you: Earlier today, the Court of Appeals (Maryland's highest court) granted a writ of certiorari (meaning they granted review) in State of Maryland v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:08 pm
On August 1, 2013 – in the case of People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:39 am
Because the evidence could permit reasonable people to draw different conclusions, the appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision and stated the case should have been submitted to a jury. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
But the surety says that it's entitled to its money back because the trial court forfeited the bond earlier, and wasn't allowed to change that decision five minutes later without providing notice to the surety.The Court of Appeal, like the trial court, disagrees. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
By contrast, for people who perhaps look differently than I do, it might make a very big difference indeed, and affect in a very nontrivial way how they experience their daily lives.Not that any opinion by the California Court of Appeal is going to solve the underlying problem, of course. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
Which is what the Court of Appeal says as well. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
The recent decision from the United States Supreme Court in Caetano v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Baughn v. [read post]
