Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 1681 - 1700 of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2008, 11:25 pm
AC, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWHC 3036 (Admin) was a judicial review which concerned funding for an illegal overstayer and her family under s.17 Children Act 1989, although it would also apply for s.20 funding. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
She also reports that her new employer told her that she has trouble looking into people's eyes, and that it was difficult to have meetings and conversations with her. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
The position was, however, different in relation to VBN’s “job description”  – although this would lead many people to identify her and would be an intrusion “the information about her job description is an important feature of the story”. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
A complainant had made allegations about an alleged perpetrator who had the same name first name as Mr Khuja but she failed to identify him as her abuser at an identification procedure. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
With the IWF, however, not only are the decisions taken behind closed doors, arguably understandable in the light of the sensitivity of the matter under concrn, but so is the implementation.The IWF blocklist is encrypted; arguably so that when it is sent to ISPs, the number of people who can actually read it is minimised. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 2:55 am
According to this report by Jon Newton at p2pnet.net, Joel Tenenbaum's mother had an opportunity to speak about her son's case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]