Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 1681 - 1700 of 15,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2025, 7:04 am
Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission and Rivers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Generally though, this makes it very hard for people to tell consumers that their products are like trade marked products in some respect.]IPKat concluding commentIf Intel was the low point of Art.5(2) protection for trade mark owners then this has got to be the high point, particularly when taken in conjunction with the approach to comparative advertising. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Comment With up to 3500-4500 detainees at any given time, the UK operates one of the largest immigration detention estates in Europe and 30,000 people are detained annually. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Old Fox
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:22 am by SHG
  Via Doug Berman, his decision in United States v. [read post]
The Speaker assured the people of Ghana that the House is live and at work amidst the determination of the suit Afenyo Markins v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now the US Supreme Court in a case styled Utah v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff sues the Otisville people for the constitutional (due process) violation of denying him the right to appear in person for his hearing; he claims the failure to comply with the state directive cause his excessive force case to be dismissed.The case is Dixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:16 am by David E. Bernstein
Unfortunately, however, the book seems to have staying power, and is even being cited favorably in the academic literature by people who should know better. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm by Mitch Stoltz
On Friday, the major US movie studios quietly backed away from the worst parts of the censorship power-grab they attempted in July in the Paramount v. [read post]