Search for: "Perry v Perry" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 12:50 am by Laura Sandwell
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
” The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER), the sole sponsor of Perry v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm by lawmrh
Wade, the “ultimate judicial usurpation” and piles his own dollop of foam on the ‘Obama v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Perry, the 6th District holds that in cases involving multiple sexual offenses, the trial court should impose a sex offender classification on each of them, rather than impose one classification based on the highest offense level… Picky picky picky:  In State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
The cases decided most quickly have been Perry v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:26 am by Andrew Trask
Perry," or "Draft book review post on why more lawyers don't use Martin Redish. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
” “I Come From Cyberspace” In his iconic “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,” Grateful Dead lyricist, EFF cofounder, and cyberlibertarian John Perry Barlow threw down the gauntlet on behalf of cyberspace: Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Joshua Matz
Simon Meiners and Perry Stein of The New Republic report on the Court’s “ineffective archival methods. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:14 am by Mi Patente
Horch & Cie. en 1899, cuyo primer automóvil comenzó a circular por vías públicas en 1901. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Jon
Supreme Court precedent declaring an unfunded mandate unconstitutional, Printz v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]