Search for: "Roberts v. District Court" Results 1681 - 1700 of 8,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm by Eileen McDermott
The case was remanded back to the district court after the appellate court found that certain instructions given by the district court to the jury were erroneous and prejudicial. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:09 am by Jennifer Davis
The case was taken to the Supreme Court, and in 1953, the Court agreed in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:12 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  (At the Seila Law oral argument, Chief Justice Roberts raised the CFPB’s funding outside of the appropriations process as a potential factor for the Court to consider.) [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am by John Jascob
The CFTC filed the complaint in the Northern District of Illinois and the matter was assigned to Judge Robert Blakey. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court dismissed their claims, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana’s 4th district, who will video tweet afterwards to say that he helped defend the law in the federal district court before being elected to Congress in 2016 from the district that includes Shreveport. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am by Robert Liles
Overview of Dental Claims Audits and Investigations by Medicaid and Private Payors in 2019 (March 4, 2020):  Many dentists and dental practices around the country are glad that 2019 is behind us. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
For example, Roberts posited, the district court would examine the availability of doctors and clinics in a particular state, so that the results could be different in different states. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am by Kari Hong
The court of appeals remanded the case to the district court to consider the merits of Thuraissigam’s claims. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Robert Liles
  Unless a defendant is able to show that a civil action has been brought solely to obtain evidence for a criminal prosecution, courts have not been sympathetic to the stalking horse argument.[11] For additional guidance on the risks presented when dealing with parallel civil and criminal investigations, you may wish to review our article titled “A Civil Investigative Demand Issued to You or Your Medical Practice is Serious Business. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The underlying history of Oberlander v Wolf  2020 NY Slip Op 50263(U) Decided on February 25, 2020 Supreme Court, Suffolk County St. [read post]