Search for: "Ruth v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Many court-watchers thought that the justices might settle the issue of partisan gerrymandering once and for all, or at the very least provide more guidance, last term, in Gill v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am by Margo Schlanger
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus is one such commentator. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that close to 30 states have weighed in on Husted v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:12 am
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, which struck down a state law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm
Before the Supreme Court's 6-3 judgment in Skinner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm by Ronald Mann
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider  Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]