Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Citing the 1999 Court of Appeals decision in O’Shea v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Although the California Supreme Court noted that its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Moving into second place with four post-record relists is Jordan v. not *that* Fisher, 14-8035, which asks (1) whether it is error to deny a habeas petitioner a certificate of appealability in a case in which the state supreme court was divided and another federal court of appeals would recognize the claim; and (2) whether the fact that the prosecutor did not expand the sentence to which the defendant was exposed prohibits a finding of… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
It’s easy to do it wrong U.S. ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
Court of Appeals (D.C.'s equivalent of a state supreme court): Mr. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm
In US ex rel Damuth Services v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
In US ex rel Damuth Services v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
"[23] And the court ruled that, since cyberspace has no borders, any state regulation of the internet imposed impermissible inconsistent regulations.[24] "[T]he unique nature of cyberspace necessitates uniform national treatment," the court concluded.[25] Several other courts, including federal courts of appeals, have followed Pataki's analysis and broad conclusion, albeit limited primarily to the context of state… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
The standard is exemplified by the case of State of Colo. ex rel. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 am
State ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
” State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
