Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Section 110(c)(5) should be deleted. 1798.120(c): The language is inconsistent about 16 year olds (or, if you read the restriction as applying only to 14 and 15 year olds, then it’s inconsistent about 13 year olds): “a business shall not sell the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, in the case of consumers between 13 and 16 years of age, or the… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
This suggests that the provisional measures are unlikely to have any bearing on the U.S. government’s revocation of special licenses granted to aircraft manufacturers Boeing and Airbus under the JCPOA framework, which allowed the manufacturers to enter into contracts for the sale of aircraft to Iran. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:51 am
—Prior to the America Invents Act (“AIA”), the on-sale bar deemed sales more than a year before a patent filing to be prior art for purposes of invalidating a patent. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-422/16 Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v TofuTown.com GmbH. [2] Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671). [3] Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 2.5.1. [4]… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-422/16 Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v TofuTown.com GmbH. [2] Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671). [3] Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 2.5.1. [4]… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am
C). [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 3:20 am
” L’Oreal S.A. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
“Necessity” is the mother of discretion.United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
Rudkin, for James C. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Allergan Sales, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:20 am
Supreme Court case of Helvering v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm
by Thomas C. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:21 am
In Ridge Natural Resources v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 5:08 am
” Yusem v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
“ According to the Court‘s recent judgment in Holocaust litigation against Hungary (Simon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:20 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm
Of particular note is the SEC Staff’s argument that the TOM tokens issued under the Bounty Program constituted an offer and sale of securities because the respondents provided TOM tokens to investors in exchange for investors’ services designed to advance the company’s economic interests and foster a trading market for its securities. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 7:56 pm
With the first major digital lock copyright ruling last year in Nintendo of America Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
No. 9, exhibit C). [read post]
