Search for: "Scaling v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Groups across the state have been working to scale back the tax expansion with varying amounts of luck. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
It could also lead to large-scale legal action against employers in the state. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
This is particularly true in high-stakes, large-scale tort litigation in which multiple plaintiffs sue a common defendant. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” (p. 60) Martin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
In Hebbronville Lone Star Rentals, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:51 am
Here, the judgment was that Google’s default deals foreclosed rivals’ access to scale. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
The case The applicant company – no saint, even in the unsaintly tradition of Strasbourg “victims” – had engineered large-scale tax evasion schemes causing unprecedented damage to the State’s fiscal affairs whilst creating substantial riches for the company’s shareholders. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:21 pm
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
Karuk Tribe of California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
Like the UMG v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
I've now had a chance to read the Fifth Circuit's opinion in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:48 pm
Yet in a highly urbanized country in which cities and large metropolitan areas dominate the national economy, much of the cross-border movement of persons, goods, and capital inside the United States is more accurately characterized as inter-municipal rather than inter-state. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:00 am
Dickerson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 7:46 pm
Instead, members of the panel will consider scaling back the law to avoid violating the state's constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
In that case, (known as Philips v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:43 pm
See Atkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Here is the Abstract: In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
