Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
Which is perhaps not surprising given what the California Supreme Court has said on this issue, which (as today's opinion explains) is this:"Citing Graham v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 pm
Industries brought this putative class action claiming that in January and February of 2010, Wells Fargo and United States Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce and United States Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce Education Foundation ("USPAACC") sent four USPAACC-EF/Wells Fargo Asian Business Leadership Award applications. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:21 pm
In Scalia v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
United States DOL, 2024 U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:48 pm
Mills (Intra-Tribal Leadership Dispute, Casino Management)State of California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
The issue arose from a California Supreme Court case, Gion v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
See [United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:37 am
The court granted the request, made under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that the court will decide questions of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
– United States District Court – Eastern District of California – January 4th, 2016 – This is a class action case which the Plaintiff’s allege numerous employment-related claims against the Defendant. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Filarsky v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Several Courts in the Northern District of California have recently released cases involving lenders, among them: In Errico v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
The United States switched sides to advocate that the statute be ruled unconstitutional. [read post]
