Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 10,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:55 pm
“DNA evidence remains powerful inculpatory evidence even though the state concedes [its expert] overstated its probative value,” the Supreme Court wrote in McDaniel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:55 pm
“DNA evidence remains powerful inculpatory evidence even though the state concedes [its expert] overstated its probative value,” the Supreme Court wrote in McDaniel v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 11:19 am
Citing to United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:17 am
Much to the contrary, if the regulators don't help you, the courts are your only chance to solve the problem. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:56 pm
., military spending, entitlements, aid to states) declines in proportion--at least in the range in which a difference in tax rates does not promote radically different behavior. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court's paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:05 am
State, 366 N.C. 323 (2012) (decided the same day as Hest Technologies and on the same basis) Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
** Marentette v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
** Marentette v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am
This morning the Mannheim Regional Court ordered a stay of a Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
City of Detroit to the Supreme Court’s 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Digital Ally, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:10 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Parr v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
At the oral argument Monday morning in TC Heartland v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
This editorial appears in today's New York Times: Gutting Class Action The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 vote in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
