Search for: "State v. Christopher" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
Christopher Tyner, our excellent research attorney, unearthed the following cases: State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
TOM, J.P., SULLIVAN, WILLIAMS, BUCKLEY, MALONE, JJ. *1 (Cite as: 2007 WL 764515, *1 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.)) ... 7. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
  (The case is docketed as 07A304, Emmett v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Christopher Scott Barker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
This just in: the Supreme Court granted certiorari (order here) in Christopher v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
Christopher Kelly, who argued the landmark sentencing case Booker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:25 pm
iPhone Application Calculates Texas Child Support - Dallas lawyer Jimmy Verner of Verner & Brumley P.C. in the firm's North Texas Divorce & Family Law Blog The State of eDiscovery in Delaware, Pt. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:51 pm by Bill Otis
Crook, the Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, relies on "international opinion" to overturn its own precedent and to rule (in Roper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm
“Rather, it is a case like many others in which, given the current state of knowledge, it is not possible to prove whether the negligent actions of a defendant caused harm. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by Carter Wood
Monday Tripping Up the Utility Company: Millan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:35 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:30 pm
I'm just saying.]PD-1097-08, Christopher Irby v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:39 am by Kent Scheidegger
" Following the US Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]