Search for: "State v. Core" Results 1681 - 1700 of 8,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2015, 8:19 am by Joe Koncelik
 The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm by Fiona de Londras
Next Steps in the United States There is little doubt that, at some point, Perry v Schwarzenegger will end up in front of the US Supreme Court for a final analysis. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:21 am
PERB reverts to its earlier "past-practice" analysis in determining "unit work"Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:09 am
The European Court of Justice has given its decision today in the Irish Government challenge to the Data Retention Directive - Ireland v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
It is that same Seagate engineer's prior patent application that served as the core of Marvell unsuccessful invalidity argument. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
This is thanks to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Mary Ziegler
ShareMary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
But teaching and academic writing are at the core of the official duties of teachers and professors. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Caret v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:58 pm
See Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae at 26, Watters v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
The Supreme Court of Canada says that a core aspect of a lawyer’s duty of loyalty is the “duty of commitment to the client’s cause (sometimes referred to as ‘zealous representation’)” (R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 at para. 19). [read post]