Search for: "State v. Country" Results 1681 - 1700 of 24,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 6:22 am by Staff Writer
The State of Illinois boasts some of the toughest gun-control laws in the country. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
Arizona Republicans might introduce a bill this fall that would deny birth certificates to children born in the United States, but whose parents are not lawfully present in the country. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Unknown
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm by NARF
Pollack (Cultural Resources; National Historic Preservation Act; Tribal Consultation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html J.P. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:54 pm
Dzyuba was a native of Georgia, but went to the Ukraine before coming to the United States. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am by Richard Montes
In a case having potentially enormous implications on foreclosure actions in New York State and throughout the country, the Second Department in Bank of New York v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
For one, the Treaty doesn't even go into effect until 24 more countries ratify it. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:35 pm by gstasiewicz
” Lawyers for Afghanistan argued that a country can only be held accountable for terrorist acts if the country is on the State Department’s list of terrorist supporting countries, an interpretation of the “noncommercial tort exception” the district court said would lead to an “absurd” result Congress could not have intended. [read post]