Search for: "State v. Events Intern., Inc."
Results 1681 - 1700
of 1,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
State of New York, 3 F.3d 581 (2d Cir.1993), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 710 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir.1983) (noting that a “federal court applying state law is bound to adhere to decisions of the state’s intermediate appellate courts absent some persuasive indication that the state’s highest court would decide the issue otherwise”); McMahan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
and various state laws. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
(Citing Burns v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:07 am
See EEOC v Shoney’s, Inc., 536 F. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
In any event, Justice Bucaria held that her unclean hands defense was not adequate to stave off dissolution since "'the critical consideration is the fact that dissension exists and has resulted in a deadlock precluding the successful and profitable conduct of the corporation's affairs'" (quoting Matter of Goodman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
American Electric Power Company Inc., ____F.3d ____, No. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:34 pm
Brightly multicoloured, underlined, boxed and highlighted, these notes were a relic of the bygone era when the most challenging of events was making it to a 9am Jurisprudence lecture. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Mikula v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
