Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1681 - 1700 of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm by Jason Rantanen
It would be simpler for a patent holder to just use the U.S. patent to cover foreign activity. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
Therefore, it would be unlawful and unfair to have ISP/IBPs bear the costs of [expensive] blocking injunctions whilst right holders have other [cheaper!] [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment   1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The ACPA prohibits “cybersquatting,” which occurs “when a person other than the trademark holder registers the domain name of a well known trademark and then attempts to profit by either ransoming the domain name or by using the domain name to direct business from the trademark holder to the domain name holder.” DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm by Dan Rodriguez
Judge Crotty takes from a not especially prominent Supreme Court case from a dozen years ago, Holder v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Holder has been a reality for South Dakota Native Americans since 1975. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Continuing our coverage of the invitation briefs filed by the United States in the past few weeks, the Solicitor General’s office has filed briefs recommending that certiorari be denied in the following cases: No. 08-448, CNN v. [read post]