Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am
” Yet the dissent, despite the Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of such review in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am
Writing for the Court in Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
So the Supreme Court just held this morning, in an opinion (Ramos v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm
Husted (2016): application for stay October 25, 2016; denied October 31, 2016Arizona Secretary of State’s Office v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
United States, 19-783. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
The justices denied review today; Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who heard the case when it was argued in the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:44 am
Regents of the University of California, involving the Trump administration’s decision to unwind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA; and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
(relisted after the March 6, March 20 and March 27 conferences) United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:00 am
In New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh noted that they would have granted Cannon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:59 am
United States, which involves whether the ban on second or successive filings of habeas petitions applies to federal prisoners seeking collateral review, suggesting that “the Court should take this up” in a different case, as Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated his willingness to do. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
United States, 19-6113, and Bazan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
United States and New Prime v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:40 pm
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
And in Avery v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
“What I said to the court in answer to Justice Roberts’ and Justice Kavanaugh’s questions was: Perhaps the burdens of a law could change a bit state by state, but these laws have no benefits,” Rikelman said. [read post]
