Search for: "State v. London" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Ashley Deeks
States such as the U.K. widely employ closed circuit cameras in public spaces, and London’s metropolitan police purportedly deployed a trial of facial recognition software at a gathering in August 2017. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
MsLods’ news round-up: law+technology, 20 July 2014 Next week in the courts This is a busy week for the media courts with three trials taking place in London. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom has sanctioned London Live, after an interview with conspiracy theorist David Icke that “risked causing significant harm to viewers”. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:16 am by Donald Dinnie
  https://www.financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2024/09/Lowe-v-Certain-Underwriters-at-Lloyds-of-London-Subscribing-to-Policy-Number-ATCSI00100-2024-FCA-858.pdf Lowe v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number ATCSI00100 [2024] FCA 858 – BarNet Jade – BarNet Jade [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:29 pm by Charon QC
Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] UKHL 5, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was a claim by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
 Some features that remain in the Rules are:Only "Universities and other non-profit educational bodies of higher or professional education established in a Member State of the European Union", and not commercial providers, will be able to offer the course (Rule 6).The minimum duration of the Course remains at 120 hours of lectures and practical training (Rule 4).Examination must include both a written and oral examination (Rule 4).Also unchanged is that a European patent… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm by Giorgio Luceri
In July, the General Court ruled in Case T-768/20 (Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO) on the importance of distinguishing between the place where hotel and ancillary services are offered and the specific place of use of the mark when assessing genuine use of EU trade marks. [read post]