Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 19,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2021, 3:21 pm
Marks. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:35 pm
In Grapha-Holding AG v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 7:13 am
The following commentary is by Mark Botti, a partner in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:36 am
Facts: This case (Saulsbery v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 1:59 am
However, the use of the mark on the dissenters’ website did not cause confusion because their website clearly noted that it was distinct from the LNC (Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:54 am
The case is entitled Thompson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Matthew Forys is the chief of staff at Landmark Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The federal anti-dilution law mandates that a mark must be so widely known to everyone across the United States as to be in the category of “famous” marks. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
Scott Stawski v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The post Update: Stone Brewing v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Belinda Montoya plead guilty to possession of cocaine and was sentenced to fourteen months in a state jail facility. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Correction officer trainee dismissed after failing to keep his beard trimmedVales v State of New Jersey, CA3, No. 07-2971, opinion filed August 12, 2008 [marked "Not Precedential" and not published]Juan Valdes, a former corrections officer trainee, was discharged from the New Jersey Department of Corrections Officer Training Program for failing to keep his beard within a one-eighth inch allowance granted to him by the Academy as an accommodation of his religious… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:02 pm
State. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm
The fact that the Salt story involves restaurants in Vancouver and Toronto is also of interest, given that we are waiting to hear how the Supreme Court of Canada will rule in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
