Search for: "State v. Robert E. Post"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 5:51 am
Noyes E. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
The co-authors, Robert Hazell and Bob Morris, have also published a blog post summarising the conclusions of both reports, here. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Erin E. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 273(e), only persons who have been using the invention commercially may take advantage of the defense. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm
: The Growth of State and Local Laws Prohibiting Family Responsibilities Discrimination, by Stephanie Bornstein and Robert J. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
Lewow v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Earlier commentaries can be found under the "related posts" link below and at the companion discussion of the book at EJIL: Talk!] [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
The petitioner must establish these requirements by a preponderance of the evidence. 42 U.S.C. s 11603(e)(1)(A). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Becker, Georgia State e-reserves case: states that the publisher’s right to collect fees is a powerful argument countering fair use which counsels against D when there is a reasonable licensing mechanism available that isn’t used. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
The most famous decision might be the UK Supreme Court’s Ruling in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd, which was reported on this blog here. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Here’s another example, noted in Jack’s post: Republican states are now refusing to accept expanded Medicaid funding under Obamacare, presumably for reasons that have to do with party organization and ideology. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
On Nov. 19, circuit judges Henry Lackey, Robert Elliott and Andrew Howorth all told the state Supreme Court they would "awate" the appointment of a special judge to take on the case, Jones v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
From Parker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
E. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
You can reach her by e-mail at mary.dudziak@emory.edu [read post]
