Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 1681 - 1700
of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 2:57 am
For judgment, please download: [2016] UKSC 58For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court website [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
R (NM) Secretary v of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1816 - Read judgment This case concerned whether the prison authorities were in breach of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Equality Act 2010 when they failed to conduct a form investigation into a sexual assault against a prisoner with learning disabilities, NM. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
S. 83; Brooke v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Anyone desiring a copy of Judge Nealon's 28 page Opinion in the case of Davis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
R. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
By: John R. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
By: John R. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:23 pm
From In re Leroy R. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:52 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Earlier today, the Supreme Court held in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:59 pm
The first of these, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:58 pm
On Friday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
R v Hickey is the most recent case to consider the legality of an apprehension pursuant to s. 28(1) of the MHA. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:15 pm
R & R Sails Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
These cases generally fall into two categories: 1) where state conduct compromises the fairness of an accused’s trial (the “main” category); and 2) where state conduct creates no threat to trial fairness but risks undermining the integrity of the judicial process (the “residual” category) (O’Connor, at para. 73). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
Mailee R. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:51 pm
In State of Utah v Brooks, Andrew Brooks appealed the district court’s decision to revoke and reinstate his probation and serve a minimum of 90 days in jail. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
R. [read post]
