Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:27 am
Howes v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
” In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
Sullivan, the Supreme Court stated that actual malice means that the words were published with knowledge of its falsity and a reckless disregard for the truth. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm
But to hold that the October 2000 Cole bombing, as well as the earlier failed attack on the USS The Sullivans, took place during an armed conflict requires conceding to al Qaeda the nation-state’s prerogative to declare hostilities. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:33 pm
His arraignment will occur within 30 days.By way of background, the charges specified concern actual and attempted attacks on three vessels (the so-called "boats operation"):USS Cole in the Port of Aden in 2000, USS The Sullivans also in Yemen in 2000, and M/V Limberg, a French civilian oil tanker, in 2002.The photo at left is of USS Cole and comes from a website dedicated to the memorial to the victims of the attack. 17 U.S. service members died and dozens were injured… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The following in an excerpt from a memo sent in by our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the decision: BACKGROUND Washington Mutual, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The following in an excerpt from a memo sent in by our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the decision: BACKGROUND Washington Mutual, Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:19 am
From DOD’s press release: The Department of Defense announced today that the Convening Authority, Office of Military Commissions referred charges to a military commission in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am
This was the issue presented to the Louisiana Supreme Court in the case, Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Moreover, during his deposition, Lewis repeatedly states that he does not have an opinion as to the amount of the loss. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
I recently received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the proposals. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:17 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964); St. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment limits common-law defamation claims brought by public officials. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Judge Walton, Sullivan says, also never found that the petitioner raised a finger against the United States or its allies. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
I just received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the release. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm
In other words, the state prisoner must give the state courts an opportunity to act on his claims before he presents those claims to a federal court in a habeas petition.Interpreting this exhaustion requirement, the United States Supreme Court in O’Sullivan v Boerckel (526 U.S. 838 [1999]) held that a prisoner who fails to present his claims in a petition for discretionary review to a state court of last resort has not properly presented… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
