Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 11:13 am
Matorin v Chief Justice, SJ… by Richard Vetstein on Scribd [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am
The most important is a ‘use it or lose it’ provision which states that proceedings may not be commenced once a period of 6 months has passed from the date that the s21 notice was given to the tenant. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
”The most recent adoption of a Restatement section by the Washington Supreme Court was in Gerlach v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:05 am
Look at Finch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:37 am
The notice shall inform the tenant of the tenant’s responsibility to maintain the smoke detection device in proper operating condition and of penalties for failure to comply with the provisions of RCW 48.48.140(3). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:36 am
Consider the case of Landmark HHH, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
The majority in Kelo emphasized that nothing in its decision prevented states from placing restrictions upon the exercise of eminent domain specifically through state statutes or constitutional interpretations as to what qualifies as a "public use. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 pm
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Washington Post Article Wall Street Journal Article The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
In addition the judgment also stated that the assessment as to whether or not a room is a bedroom should ignore what it is actually being used for by the tenant. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 10:51 pm
This is actually stated in s5 of the Housing Act 1988, which talks about a periodic tenancy ‘arising’ on the expiry of the fixed term. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
In what was a surprise to many of us (most certainly to the City of Charlevoix and municipal entities around the state), the further held the death of the original joint owner (the father) was not a transfer. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
Two years ago in March, I reported here on the Klooster v City of Charlevoix case, which addressed the issue of "uncapping" in a real estate transaction between family members. 1994 amendments to the Michigan Real Property Tax, placed a "cap" on the amount a taxing authority could increase the value of real property under consistent ownership. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
A recent federal court case, Adams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:40 am
The opinion is styled, Carlos Alaniz v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:40 am
The opinion is styled, Carlos Alaniz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:41 am
We got the same idea in Maempel v Malta 24202/10. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:04 pm
" In Gallo v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
In 1962, the defendant transferred title to herself and the plaintiff as tenants by the entirety. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 11:52 am
Saha & Sons v. [read post]
