Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Donald" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix Chambers
There is no doubt, however, that the UK Parliament has the power to make arrangements for referendums anywhere within the UK on such issues as it wishes to consult the people on. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
  Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
(NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,I, DONALD J. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
These self-proclaimed democratsclamor to speak for the rising people, over and above the established elites and tired institutions. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Jane Bambauer
Donald Trump, Alex Jones and the most active influencers in the QAnon community are recklessly indifferent to the cumulative impact of their online activity. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm by Charlie Dunlap
Nevertheless, she readily participated in judging the Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Yes, that Michael Avenatti Michael Avenatti enjoyed his 15 minutes of fame representing porn star Stormy Daniels in her suit against then-President Donald Trump. [read post]