Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 51,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:13 pm
By Daniel RichardsonPorter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:43 pm
The landowners were given Conservation District Use Permits (CDUP) for the construction of single family residences on their respective properties, but the permits did not allow the owners to rent the residences or use them for commercial purposes. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:32 am
Simon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
Lloyd Lifestyle Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:31 am
The COFC’s decision in Tolliver Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
* Handshoe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:58 pm
Whether a duty exists in a given situation is usually a question of law to be resolved by the court. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
Given Twitter’s ban of Trump, the Court will likely reject that petition.) [read post]
Deportation Update: Biden Has Given Prosecutors More Power To Decide Which Immigration Cases To Drop
7 Jun 2021, 11:35 am
(Meza Morales 7th Cir, 2020; Romero v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
The judgment provides a useful exposition of the ‘bane and antidote’ principle. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
It appears to remain good law, albeit rather rarely used. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
In the recent case of Firsht v Readman, Mr. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 12:18 pm
Which seems only appropriate given the topic of the underlying appeal. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:01 am
Without an applicable standard form, and given the costs and difficulties of small firms contracting over exit, the court had to essentially make up a deal for the party ex post. [read post]
