Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2014, 11:20 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The Supreme Court's June 2013 ruling on U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At MSNBC, Adam Serwer discusses the influence that Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
The specific software Jones used to identify Dillow is, so far as the briefing reveals, in the sole possession of the Perrysburg PoliceDepartment -- Dillow recites the language of Rule 16 in his Motion in a bid to place the software programs within its scope, but does not specifically allege that the United States Attorney has actual control over that software. . . . [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am by Orin Kerr
Instead, on appeal the DC Circuit takes precedent seriously and tries to square the NSA surveillance program with United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:50 pm by Michael Froomkin
I think the most one can say here is that if the Supreme Court wants to revisit Smith as five Justices may have signaled in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:23 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
Judge Leon also looks to the case last term in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Amy Howe
At Inter Alia, the online companion to the Yale Law and Policy Review, Brian Christopher Jones uses United States v. [read post]