Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Three Minnesota corporations — one that promotes anti-abortion causes, one that supports low taxes and limited government, and a for-profit corporation in the travel business — contended that the state law, applicable only in state elections, is just like a federal law at issue in the January decision (Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
As it stands, district judges have no authority to order the release of a detainee to the United States even when it is the only remedy. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:19 am by Mairead Enright
An t-Ard Chlaraitheoir (alteration to birth certificate of transwoman) and T v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:55 am by admin
Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of whistleblower Alfred Winder, holding that the 2009 amendment to the D.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
§104A) "altered the traditional contours of copyright protection" by restoring copyrights in works of foreign origin that were previously in the public domain in the United States, and that the law was therefore subject to First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm by Richard S. Zackin
United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved a disagreement among the lower federal courts over the scope of the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” clause. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm by Richard S. Zackin
United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved a disagreement among the lower federal courts over the scope of the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” clause. [read post]