Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2011, 4:25 am by Steven M. Gursten
” He cited statistics for all drivers – not just truckers – showing that 20 percent of all crashes are related to drowsy driving, with two million drivers a week in the United States nodding off and falling asleep at the wheel. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  For over 200 years, not only in the United States but also in England, most people are deeply suspicious of any order of that kind. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:52 pm by Marcus Fulton
For a year and a half after CAAF affirmed NMCCA in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am by SHG
From the 9th Circuit decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Federal Circuit said that an invention either had to be tied to a machine or apparatus, or it had to transform an article into a different state or thing. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Federal Circuit said that an invention either had to be tied to a machine or apparatus, or it had to transform an article into a different state or thing. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Public health authorities in those states used epidemiological evidence to pin the blame on Hochstetler's dairy. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]