Search for: "United States v. Man" Results 1681 - 1700 of 6,940
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Mayo Collaborative reviewed how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court permitted the state of Alabama to execute a Muslim man, Domineque Ray, without his religious advisor present. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Michael Lowe
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:55 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the company also claims the lower court’s decision went against established United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm by Sheldon Gilbert
Rock, of Boston, as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:06 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The collateral civil litigation in Arctic Man claims that the subject of such an arrest was merely exercising his right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lee E. Berlik
” The court found the tweet was not actionable “because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court upholds the search of a man who was arrested for possessing child pornography, involving the "good faith" exception under the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]