Search for: "WAL-MART CORPORATION"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 4:16 am
The installment also discussed a potential inconsistency in Wal-Mart’s commitment to equal employment opportunity, and talked about the importance of consistency in corporate culture. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm
Plus, unless you are the size of Exxon, Microsoft or Wal-Mart, you will still need to purchase excess insurance to protect your company from catastrophic workers' compensation claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm
Wal-Mart argues that no plaintiff class action can be certified because there is no allegation of a policy of intentional discrimination emanating from corporate HQ. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:16 pm
Wal-Mart asserts that no such corporate-wide policy exists, that each individual Wal-Mart store acted alone, and that there can be no corporate-wide class. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:45 am
Wal-Mart A Skeptical U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Wal-Mart’s strategy, then? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:22 am
Statistical Sampling Meanwhile, Wal-Mart’s attorney Boutrous faced active questioning from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsburg on Wal-Mart’s arguments that statistical sampling was not permitted. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
” Tuesday’s argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
The class certified in the Wal-Mart case is a “b2” class action. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:59 am
A couple of months ago, I wondered what would happen for about 1.5 million women when the Supreme Court got its hands on the class-action, gender-discrimination lawsuit against corporate giant Wal-Mart. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:51 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:56 am
” The discretion, he added, is then used within “a very strong corporate culture” that leads managers to be “informed by the values the company provides. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:56 am
The Plaintiffs' attorney tried to argue the policy or practice was that: "Wal-Mart provided to its managers unchecked discretion" in making pay decisions, but also had a "very strong corporate culture that ensures . . . the Wal-Mart way. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:57 pm
Wal-mart may be the country’s largest non-government employer and is the 2nd richest corporation as listed in the Forbes 500 but all that money isn’t really going anywhere, least of all, to the pay of their female employees. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm
If you look at the briefs that have been filed in support on Wal-Mart's side, it amounts to a who's-who in corporate America. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
Related articles Wal-Mart gender suit before U.S. top court (cbc.ca) High court appears to favor Wal-Mart in gender-bias case (chron.com) Court hears argument in Wal-Mart sex bias claim (ctv.ca) Wal-Mart “too big” to be sued? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:32 am
Nearly all of the accounts flowing out of the high court on Tuesday indicate that the justices seemed skeptical of the suit, hinting that it was unfair to Wal-Mart. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
As Nan Aron at the Alliance for Justice wrote, "if Wal-Mart succeeds, not only will women at Wal-Mart be unable to change pay and promotion disparities, but future lawsuits related to employment discrimination, civil rights, antitrust violations, and consumer protection will be significantly hampered, discouraging cases brought by large groups of people against broad-based corporate malfeasance. [read post]
