Search for: "Waite v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 10,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Last week, I read United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 2:11 pm
The application (Parnell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:51 am
Dusty (pictured below) arrived at that number by excluding all 2011 opinions captioned "State v. ____. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:05 am
., Edmunds, reversed the Eastern District of Tennessee's denial of a motion to suppress and vacated a defendant's sentence on a firearms offense in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
See Khan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:06 am
Virgin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Day 1 AM can’t wait to start the day!! [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am
Johnson v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:23 pm
Despite its holding, the court nevertheless stated that it agreed with the Plaintiffs that “[t]he State’s track record in supporting DHHL’s success is poor, as evidenced by the tens of thousands of qualified applicants on the waiting lists and the decades-long wait for homestead lots. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:31 pm
In Wimmer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm
The defendant relied on two recent United States Supreme Court decision Crawford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
While waiting for my flight to leave San Diego on my way to Washington, DC for the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting, I saw on Twitter—the best source for immediate Supreme Court news—that the Supreme Court had decided Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:11 pm
I attended the argument in Giles v. [read post]