Search for: "**jackson v. Long" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 6:41 am by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
  What is interesting is that the exact same phony cost benefit arguments that the Supreme Court held  EPA need not consider in Whitman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:13 am by Ken Kersch
The Supreme Court this term will also consider two cases (Jackson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9646 and Jackson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  I think it does make sense to have one individual serve for a long period of time in that capacity. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9646, Jackson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 October 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat heard an application in the long running libel case of Morrissey v McNicholas – Morrissey having issued the claims in 2007, contending that the NME had accused him of racism. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  (The Court CVSG’ed in Cook after the Long Conference.) [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Lyle Denniston
Alabama (11-9646) and Jackson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
On Monday 17 October 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat will hear an application in the long running libel case of Morrissey v McNicholas & anr – Morrissey having issued the claims in 2007, contending that the NME had accused him of racism. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am by Legal Beagle
And it does not enjoy the sovereignty of the Crown in Parliament that, as Lord Bingham said in  Jackson, para 9, is the bedrock of the British constitution. [read post]