Search for: "*grand Jury, in Re"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 2:07 pm
He has been jailed since he was indicted in June 2009 by a federal grand jury in Houston, where his companies were headquartered. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:51 pm
" When Hurd appeared in court, he waived his right to a preliminary hearing, which means that prosecutors will take the case before a grand jury. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
A grand jury in Alaska later indicted some of the Seattle citizens, but those charges too were dropped. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:50 pm
” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 643 F.2d 226, 228 (5th Cir.1981). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
The fifth amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law… The sixth amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
The hearing came a day after a Beaufort County grand jury handed down an indictment on one count of first-offense criminal domestic violence, we were told by a spokesman for South Carolina’s Fourteenth Circuit Solicitor’s Office (which we understand is the equivalent of a district attorney). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:37 am
Ain’t technology grand? [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:33 pm
Assange is being investigated by a federal grand jury, but has not been charged with any crime, since publishing classified information is not generally considered a crime in the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
Where the indictment is factually unsupported either on its face or in the grand jury proceedings, dismissal is appropriate. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:54 pm
Not unless the jury says so. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
Refusing to talk to a grand jury without use immunity is a reasonable stance for someone to take even if she thinks she hasn’t done anything wrong—especially where, as here, the grand jury’s investigation appears to have political overtones. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:13 pm
The rest, numbers three through twelve, were ratified and officially adopted into the Constitution on this date 220 years ago, December 15, 1791.The Bill of Rights.Before the day was over, we began eviscerating them.They're not altogether gone, of course. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
So that’s a little over a grand for the time in trial, plus whatever else he made during that time. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
" The Court's decision was based, in part, on: the untruthful testimony of an FBI agent to the grand jury; the provision of false information in applications for search and seizure warrants; the improper review of e-mail communications between a defendant and her lawyer; the failure to comply with discovery obligations and other court rulings; and misrepresentations to the Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:10 am
McQueary's testimony to a grand jury -- in which Mr. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
All right, Elving, hand whichever one of these fellas you like a subpoena and we’ll go on downstairs and talk in front of the grand jury. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:25 am
” But she then very wrongly said it’s “because the perception of the public could be that you're dealing with convicted felons and that may not go over well. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:25 am
” But she then very wrongly said it’s “because the perception of the public could be that you're dealing with convicted felons and that may not go over well. [read post]
