Search for: "B. J. K."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 9:35 am
Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut; Susan J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:04 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:05 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:59 am
Coburn) – Independent Assessment Of The Drug And Biologic Application Review Process: The amendment requires FDA to “contract with a private, independent consulting firm capable of performing the technical analysis, management assessment, and program evaluation tasks required to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the process for the review of” applications under FDC Act § 505(b) and § 505(j) for drugs and PHS Act § 351(a) and §… [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:40 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Macey, Lesley K. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:19 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The opponent filed an appeal against the rejection of its opposition by the Opposition Division (OD).In the following extract the Board deals with the admissibility of the appeal:[2.1] As far as the admissibility of the present appeal is concerned, the provisions of the EPC 1973 are to be applied, since all the time limits for complying with the conditions for filing an appeal under A 108 EPC 1973 had expired before the revised EPC entered into force on 13 December 2007 (see also J 10/07… [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:17 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:10 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
They agreed with each other although Kay LJ gave the lead judgment on the former, answered in the positive; and Henderson J gave the lad judgment on the latter, answered in the negative.On the former, the appellants’ case was that the rules had a disparate adverse impact on the disabled or fail to take account of the differences between the disabled and the able-bodied. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
They agreed with each other although Kay LJ gave the lead judgment on the former, answered in the positive; and Henderson J gave the lad judgment on the latter, answered in the negative.On the former, the appellants’ case was that the rules had a disparate adverse impact on the disabled or fail to take account of the differences between the disabled and the able-bodied. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:45 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
19 May 2012, 4:20 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:43 am
" Answers: (a) Groucho; (b) Mitt; (c) Mitt; (d) Groucho; (e) Mitt; (f) Groucho; (g) Mitt; (h) Groucho; (i) Mitt; (j) Groucho; (k) Groucho; (l) Mitt; (m) Mitt; (n) Groucho; (o) Groucho; (p) Mitt; (q) Mitt; (r) Groucho; (s) Mitt; (t) Groucho; (u) Groucho; (v) Mitt Groucho [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:09 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:05 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:02 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:57 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
