Search for: "BRIGHT V US"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:43 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (full decision here) in Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
2015 started out with such promise, but here it is a mere sixteen days in and it’s already shot to Hell, with you sitting there devitalizing your bright eyes with our pixelated nonsense. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:27 pm
The royalty base.Even Judge Robart held in the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:12 am
Local News 52-year-old Harmon V. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm
Louisiana case law has created different factors and tests to apply this theory; however, there is no bright line rule in use. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:34 am
On January 13, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Mach Mining, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
(see, e.g., Playboy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
Juan del Hierro is director of Ministry Empowerment for Unity on the Bay and was a plaintiff in Grimsley and Albu v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:28 pm
In Moncrieffe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
[1] Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
Photo Credit: Daniel Logo via Flickr (CC by 2.0) In a unanimous decision, the US Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of whether time the employer requires an employee to do something is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Although brought into statute through Bill 198 in 2002, the test used on this threshold precedes the amendments and can be found in Meyer v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:02 am
TV Eyes, White v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:57 am
Good News The report also highlights four bright spots that surfaced during the year in: Wage and Hour Litigation: The California Supreme Court in Duran v. [read post]
