Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 21,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Grutter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
But even if a bill does become a law, all of us are increasingly well aware that that is not the last step. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
The bill was not successful, but efforts to pass similar legislation are expected. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:51 am
Under the prior standard imposed by the PDA and interpreted by the Supreme Court in Young v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 4:10 am
On January 19, the Indiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Under the prior standard imposed by the PDA and interpreted by the Supreme Court in Young v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:43 pm
The decision will have a profound effect on federal and state courts who are increasingly confronted with billing disputes and fraud claims against providers. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
Fund v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term—Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:05 am
In Holder v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” But the whistleblower’s cert petition argues that Sarbanes-Oxley shifts the burden to the employer to prove a lack of retaliatory intent as an affirmative defense (Murray v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
He cited two subsequent cases, State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Broadly speaking, development of the term in federal and state common law courts resulted in two distinct yet overlapping meanings. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:21 am
See Austin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:07 am
Allegations of deceit or the intent to deceive must be pied with particularity (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2d Dept 2018), affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; Face book, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d at 615 [ dismissing a Judiciary Law § 487 claim where the allegations of scienter were conclusory and were not supported by specific facts]). [read post]
