Search for: "COOPER v. LONG"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Connecticut); that states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot ignore them (Cooper v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
The nine men have long been cleared for release, but have been unable to go home due to a White House policy that bars the repatriation of detainees to Yemen. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
(division des Aliments Krispy Kernels inc.) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:16 pm
Further, the Court finds that NYCCS has violated a number of the basic principles outlined in Nicholson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:37 am
Zubik gets weirder The government’s position in Zubik v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
In Orsatti v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 12:42 pm
But Nichols v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
” Laura Holgate, one of the President Obama’s top advisers on weapons of mass destruction was quoted saying that “while there’s no information that broader plot exists, the threat of terrorists trying to launch an improvised attack with a nuclear device has long been a concern of security officials worldwide. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
SAP, No. 15-1145 (scope of CBM review) Post Grant Admin: Cooper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:56 pm
The recently decided New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am
Key also voiced his approval for the Philippines v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:05 am
Supreme Court settled the issue as to whether an accommodation needs to be specifically requested by holding in EEOC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:21 am
As Justice Roberts observed in Riley v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Foreign Minister Wang Yi suggested that the Philippines v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
Notably, advocates of this approach have been vague as to methods and criteria for areas warranting closure – an indication that those issues are difficult to surmount.[10] There are two obvious problems with this, the first of which is that removing access to these capabilities frustrates all uses, good, bad and neutral, and the second of which is that it is not technically possible, at least not without the cooperation of Internet service providers in those regions. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:40 am
In a recently published decision, D.G. and S.H. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:18 pm
Knutsen v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
