Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 34,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
(As we explained here, AB 5 codified and expanded the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 12:23 pm
In the absence of controlling or conflicting California law, California courts generally look to federal regulations under the FLSA for guidance…. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:55 pm
The legal complaint (pdf) in the case, Weiss v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:37 am
Lyft argued that the California Supreme Court’s holding in Iskanian v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
EGL, Inc. that California law determines the classification of a worker employed in California even when the worker’s contract contains a choice-of-law provision. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
In 2014, after Concepcion was decided, the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
The 1985 California Court of Appeal decision in Loral Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:48 am
This case concerned California law. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:52 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California: Wang v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:11 pm
Compare Hamner v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:11 pm
Compare Hamner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
” Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Unfair Competition Law Claim at 3, Waymo LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 11:19 am
One of the cases, Kilby v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
In 1982, following the recommendations of the California Law Revision Commission, the Enforcement of Judgments Law (EJL) was enacted. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
Questions of law are reviewed de novo. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm
With the defeat of the bill, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:35 pm
The limits have been challenged before, but this case, Van Buren v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:32 am
The closely watched case of Taus v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:49 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its closely divided opinion in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Schickman, an attorney with Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco and an editor of California Employment Law Letter, said the morning after the bill passed. [read post]
