Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 34,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
While a significant development under Title VII, this case doesn’t change the applicable legal standard under California law. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
The post Can California "Safe at Home" Law Be Used to Retroactively Seal or Pseudonymize Past Federal Cases? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
[v] Cedar Point v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
Compare Kanter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
In 1977, in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
The Supreme Court’s precedents on affirmative action dated back to 1978, when a divided Court came to a mixed decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
” Following the court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
” Loving v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Petitioner, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), is a nonprofit or- ganization whose stated purpose is “to defend human and civil rights secured by law, including the right of individuals to equal protection under the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Petitioner, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), is a nonprofit or- ganization whose stated purpose is “to defend human and civil rights secured by law, including the right of individuals to equal protection under the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Boston University School of Law, and Mary Ziegler, University of California, Davis School of Law, have posted Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists, which is forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review:This article employs the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
This leaves unaddressed the law applicable to directors of corporations transacting interstate, but not intrastate, business in California. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In the state case of California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
The complaint, filed in Mayanna Berrin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
In McGinity, the plaintiff, on behalf of a putative consumer class, brought state law consumer protection claims against Procter & Gamble (P&G) for violations under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
“Entitled to our land”: The settler colonial origins of the University of California. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
Schutte v. [read post]